Hello. Having read the study and now the comments as well, my comment/question is: is this a done deal as one commenter suggested; why shouldn’t there be an open debate; it would be nice to hear an opposing side (s) in an open, non-argumentative setting. Perhaps this has been or will be done by and with the islanders; are the summer folk not to be included? Precious little has come out about this idea, and I have no idea myself as to where it stands in the community, who is now handling it, and if there is any chance that any part of it might come to fruition. Can and should there not be an open discussion so the entire island can understand the pros and cons – even if we don’t all get to vote? Couldn’t a couple of people speak objectively about it, even at different times and venues with notes taken and made available? I don’t understand the problem with that in place of a lot of probably wrong gossip and rumors.
Could someone at least provide an explanation? Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment